What happen to the social media？
Social media use varies depending on an individual’s socio-cultural background, age, and other psychological factors. People converse online, exchange ideas and visuals, and believe that their interactions with the groups they have joined meet their demands for a sense of community. Although social media provides a safe space for individuals to voice their opinions publicly or anonymously, it is also a breeding ground for violent ideologies and acts. Because social media is an interactive medium and caters to a big user base, the problem has evolved and become more complex.
Bullying on social media
Once introduced, technology advances quickly. Postman (1994) calls this Frankenstein Syndrome. Social media is both individual and government independent. It’s difficult to manage. Baudrillard said the media reveals itself through diverting administrative power. Individuals become imprisoned and alienated. Humans developed and sustained social media. Humans set social and ethical rules for social media communication. Social media isn’t separate from its users. While McLuhan cogitates the digital media a strong, deciding, and independent subject, Baudrillard regards it as something that has no use value (Baban, 2012). Both philosophies agree on technological determinism when handling media.
Violence is a manner of behavior founded on the ability to hurt other animals or to be damaged. It may also imply the exertion of physical force to injure or abuse” or “injury via distortion, infringement, or profanation” (Murat Mengü, 2015). Violence includes murdering, intentionally harming, damaging, robbing, and expelling. Killing is the limit of violence. Violence includes both physical force used to inflict damage, injury, or harm and unlawful intimidation. Violence has become an everyday aspect of our life. Children and adults may be “aggressors, victims, or witnesses” (Florea, 2013). Any event may spark political, economic, or social animosity nowadays. Online banging is trendy. Media sources claim a new countrywide phenomenon called internet banging, in which gangs or neighborhood organizations use social media to encourage challenges, trade insults, or make violent threats that may culminate in murder or victimization. These incidents illustrate serious Internet misuse. Cyberbullying employs mobile phones, computers, tablets, social networking sites, text messages, chat, and websites to inflict repeated abuse.
How bulling happened
Social media may quickly disseminate sudden, violent, or abrupt events like epidemics, wars, and contentions. Mass media violence is multifaceted. In addition to TV shows, newspapers, periodicals, rap music, etc. depict violence. Toys and video games also include violence. Movies have their own category. Pornography and computer gaming might also be discussed. When media texts, with a focus on their content, are studied, there are few displays without visual violence (Yankkaya, 2009). At this stage, it appears possible to avoid violent stuff.
How to prevent?
Protecting users’ right to free speech online, stopping the spread of illicit content, and ensuring the safety of online resources all need cooperation between authorities and internet service providers (ISPs). There must be a shift toward open design and a greater emphasis on the disclosure of specific algorithmic information. The Parliamentary Assembly is encouraged to advocate for the adoption of the Council of Europe’s revised Convention for the Protection of Individuals with respect to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. Big internet firms should rethink their operations to restore users’ agency over their information, according to the report.
Parliament acknowledges and values the contribution of social media to the growth and improvement of our society. You can’t build your social capital without them since they make it easier to connect with others and spread your message. They give individuals who are marginalized in society—minorities, outsider organizations, and smaller parties—a platform to address divisive political and social issues with the general public. If citizens are exposed to new ideas and viewpoints, it could increase their engagement in politics. Despite the great potential for good that social media offers, its misuse is having major ramifications for people’s rights and happiness, the operation of democratic institutions, and the progress of our society. Cyberabuse encompasses a wide range of behaviors, including but not limited to: cyberbullying, cyberstalking, encouraging violence and discrimination online, online harassment, distributing false information and affecting public opinion, and meddling with political processes. The management of social media platforms has a potentially devastating effect on individuals’ rights to free expression and privacy. In today’s connected world, social media platforms are crucial for controlling the flow of information. The Assembly has expressed its concern with these issues, and a number of articles have tried to propose remedies to reduce or eliminate the possibility of internet abuse in these areas. However, recent events have prompted a deeper dive into the roles that social media companies and government agencies play in guaranteeing the full protection of these basic liberties.
The Assembly believes that social media networks should alter their internal regulations in order to better encourage users’ rights to free speech and access to information. This includes promoting multiple viewpoints and a wealth of information, preventing the spread of illegal material through user accounts, and making them more effective in countering misinformation. Assembly members have discussed the importance of rethinking the business model that has helped social media conglomerates amass such huge sums. The question at hand is whether to launch an assault on the business model. With this method, data on users and their social networks is collected and used for practically limitless advertising and business purposes. As it stands, it does not appear that data profiling or data mining are subject to any type of democratic oversight. Those in need of a citation can find one here: References should be included. The Assembly considers that laws should be developed and asks their respective authorities to ratify the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Respect to Automatic Processing of Personal Data and its Protocol (CETS No. 222). The ultimate goal of this protocol is to ensure the human dignity of each individual and the protection of each person’s human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as personal autonomy based on the right to control of one’s personal data and the processing of such data. The Assembly has mandated increased coordination between government agencies and internet service providers. The Assembly is singled out for special commendation for the ways in which it has contributed to the growth of partnerships and other forms of engagement between Internet service providers (ISPs) and other Council of Europe organizations. In addition, it urges all parties to step up collaboration and maintain open communication in order to spread best practices and develop standards that protect users’ rights and privacy when they participate in activities on social media.
Conclusion
To stop the spread of porn, violence, hatred, and bullying, we need both institutional and individual remedies. You, individually, must refrain from utilizing and disseminating it and also adhere to the laws established by the assembly. According to a 2018 study conducted by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania, limiting daily social media use to 30 minutes significantly reduced anxiety, sadness, loneliness, sleeplessness, and FOMO among college students. However, cutting back isn’t the only way to boost your mental health and happiness on the web. The same set of research also indicated that it was possible to improve one’s mood and concentration simply by reducing mindless social media use.
The use of social media has become second nature to many of us, serving primarily as a means of passing the time or a habit. If you know why you’re using social media, you can cut down on your time spent there while reaping the benefits and avoiding the problems. Whether you’re on social media to get a certain piece of information, to see how a friend is doing after being sick, or to update family and friends on the latest adorable pictures of your children, your experience will be vastly different depending on your goals. When you next sign onto a social media account, stop and reflect about why you’re there.
References
Amedie, J. (2015, September 2). The Impact of Social Media on Society. Santa Clara University.
Baban, E. (2012). The influence of social media from the perspectives of McLuhan and Baudrillard: Captivity of expression, observed society, lost identity syndrome. In T. Kara & E. Özgen (Ed.), Sosyal Medya [Social Media, pp. 57-79.
Florea, M. (2013). Media violence and the cathartic effect. . Social and Behavioral Scienes, pp. 349–353.
Murat Mengü, S. M. (2015, July). Violence and Social Media. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications- Volume 1, Issue 3, pp. 211-228.
Pedro Esteban Negrete Narvaez, R. E. (2016, August). Effects of Media with Violent Content on College Students’ Aggressive Reaction. Research Gate.
Postman, N. (1994). The Disappearance of Childhood. . New York, NY: Random House.
Tripathi, V. (2017, August 21). Youth Violence and Social Media. Tayloe & Francis Online, pp. 1-7.
- Akram, R. K. (2017, October 30). A Study on Positive and Negative Effects of Social Media on Society. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering.
Yanıkkaya, B. (2009). [The representation of daily life: the fear of the others, visual violence and the media . In B. Çoban (Ed.) Media, Nationalism, Violence.